Show that $(0,1)$ is connected and not compact.

Answer

In Rudin's book, the definition of "connected" is

A set $E \subset X$ is said to be connected if $E$ is not a union of two nonempty separated sets.

Two subsets $A$ and $B$ of a metric space $X$ are said to be separated if both $A \cap \overline{B}$ and $\overline{A} \cap B$ are empty

(1) Connected

Suppose $(0,1)$ is not connected. Then there are separated sets $A$ and $B$ such that $(0,1)=A \cup B$. Let $a \in A, b \in B$ and assume $a<b$ without loss of generality. Since $C:=[a,b] \cap \overline{A}$ is closed, $x:=\sup C \in C \subset \overline{A}$. Note that $x \neq b$ because $\overline{A} \cap B = \emptyset$. Then, $(x,b] \subset B$  $\Rightarrow$  $[x,b] \subset \overline{B}$  $\Rightarrow$  $x \in \overline{B}$. This implies $x \notin A,B$, but $a \leq x \leq b$  $\Rightarrow$  $x \in (0,1)=A \cup B$, which is contradiction.

(2) Not compact

Consider the open cover $\{(0,1-1/n)\}_{n=2}^\infty$. For any finite subcover $(0,1-1/n_1),\cdots,(0,1-1/n_N)$, $1-1/n_\ast \notin \bigcup_{k=1}^N(0,1-1/n_k)$ for $n_\ast>\max(n_1,\cdots,n_N)$.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Rudin, 3th ed, Chapter 5, Problem 15

Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Rudin, 3th ed, Chapter 2, Problem 14

Elementary Classical Analysis, Marsden, 2nd ed, Chapter 4, Problem 28